Dan Wallace on the earliest(?) New Testament Fragment

The P52 fragment of John’s Gospel (early second century). Close to actual size.

According to Dan Wallace (Dallas Theological Seminary), some of the oldest fragments of the New Testament have recently been discovered. Among the cache of seven manuscripts is what is being dubbed the earliest NT fragment ever found—earlier than even the P52 fragment of John’s Gospel dating to the early second century. The fragment in question happens to be from Mark’s Gospel, and as you’ll see in the video clip below, it’s being slated as a first century fragment. We’ll have to wait for the palaeographic analysis, along with other dating criteria before we can confirm such an early manuscript. I assume that these will form part of the publication of these fragments by Brill in 2013.

One of the other manuscripts is a fragment of Luke touted as early second century. If this date is verified, it could have significant implications for some recent theories on the date of Luke-Acts, which argue that the two volumes were produced after the dissemination of Josephus’ writings in the late first and early second century (eg. Steve Mason).

Fragments of Pauline letters and Hebrews are among the other manuscripts in this small cache.

Even if the date of these fragments proves not to be as early as Dan Wallace is suggesting (and there has been some scepticism expressed by some), they will still nonetheless be significant in helping trace the transmission of the New Testament. We’ll have to wait for 2013 and fork out a princely sum for the publication by Brill to learn more of the details. Until then, we can only suspend judgement and wait with eager anticipation.

You can read a little more about the discovery at the Dallas Theological Seminary website HERE.

Here’s the short interview with Dan Wallace by Mike Licona.

About these ads

5 thoughts on “Dan Wallace on the earliest(?) New Testament Fragment

  1. Pingback: Web Crawling | stephenmurray.co.za

  2. When in doubt, pick the absolutely earliest possible date for your manuscript fragment. Apologetics means never having to say you’re sorry.

    • I take that as a sceptical jibe. To be fair to Dan Wallace, he is relying on a palaeographer’s opinion, though exactly who I am not sure. In any case, when the fragments are published by Brill in 2013, we’ll be able to see for ourselves.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s